Hemodynamic indicators associated with thrombosis of LA appendage in the case of patients having atrial fibrillation

A.O. Rubanenko, Yu.V. Shchukin
Keywords: thrombosis, left atrial appendage, atrial fibrillation
Medicinskij al'manah, 2017, issue 3, pages 180-182.

The aim of the study was to investigate hemodynamic indicators associated with left atrial appendage

(LAA) thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Studied were 91 patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.

All the patients were divided into two groups: 1 group comprised 63 patients without LAA thrombosis,

2 group – 28 patients with LAA thrombosis according to transesophageal echocardiography. We found

that in patients with permanent AF factors, associated with LAA thrombosis were LAA flow velosity less

than 34 sm/s and severe SEC.

1. Kirchhof P., Benussi S., Kotecha D. et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the

management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J.

2016. № 37 (38). Р. 2893-2962 (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210).

2. Hur J., Young J.K., Nam J.E. et al. Thrombus in the Left Atrial Appendage in

Stroke Patients: Detection with Cardiac CT Angiography—A Preliminary Report.

Radiology. 2008. Vol. 249. P. 81-87.

3. Abu-Mahfouz M., Cavalcante J.L., Arida M. et al. Significance of high

sensitivity C-reactive protein and D-dimer in evaluating intracardiac thrombus

and spontaneous echo contrast in patients referred for transesophageal

echocardiography: a prospective study. Cardiology journal. 2012. Vol. 19 (3).

P. 267-273.

4. Mascioli G., Lucca E., Michelotti E. et al. Severe Spontaneous Echo Contrast/

Auricolar Thrombosis in «Nonvalvular» AF: Value of Thromboembolic Risk Scores.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017. Jan. № 40 (1). Р. 57-62.

5. Zhao Y., Ji L., Liu J. et al. Intensity of Left Atrial Spontaneous Echo Contrast as

a Correlate for Stroke Risk Stratification in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial

Fibrillation. Sci Rep. 2016. Jun. № 9 (6). 27650 р.

6. Zuo K., Sun L., Yang X. et al. Correlation between cardiac rhythm, left atrial

appendage flow velocity, and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score: Study based on

transesophageal echocardiography and 2-dimensional speckle tracking. Clin

Cardiol. 2017. Feb. № 40 (2). Р. 120-125.

7. Akdeniz B., Badak O., Baris N. et al. Left atrial appendage-flow velocity

predicts cardioversion success in atrial fibrillation. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006.

Vol. 208 (3). P. 243-250.

8. Matsumoto Y., Morino Y., Kumagai A. et al. Characteristics of Anatomy and

Function of the Left Atrial Appendage and Their Relationships in Patients with

Cardioembolic Stroke: A 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Study.

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017. Mar. № 26 (3). Р. 470-479.

9. Yu H.T., Lee J.S., Kim T.H. et al. Advanced Left Atrial Remodeling and

Appendage Contractile Dysfunction in Women Than in Men Among the Patients

With Atrial Fibrillation: Potential Mechanism for Stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016.

10. Sriram K.S., Banchs J.E., Moukabary T. et al. Detection of left atrial thrombus

by intracardiac echocardiography in patients undergoing ablation of atrial

fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015. Sep. № 43 (3). Р. 227-236.

11. Kumagai T., Matsuura Y., Yanamoto T. et al. Risk factors for left atrial

thrombus from transesophageal echocardiography findings in ischemic stroke

patients. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014. № 60 (2). Р. 154-158.

12. Rader V.J., Khumri T.M., Idupulapati M. et al. Clinical predictors of left atrial

thrombus and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in patients with atrial

fibrillation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007. Vol. 20 (10). P. 1181-1185.

13. Boyd A.C., McKay T., Nasibi S. et al. Left ventricular mass predicts left atrial

appendage thrombus in persistent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc

Imaging. 2013. Mar. № 14 (3). Р. 269-275.

A.O. Rubanenko, Yu.V. Shchukin Hemodynamic indicators associated with thrombosis of LA appendage in the case of patients having atrial fibrillation. Medicinskij al'manah 2017; (3): 180–182, http://dx.doi.org/10.21145/2499-9954-2017-3-180-182